Comments for Supreme Court Haiku Reporter http://supremecourthaiku.com/blog1 THE LAW OF THE LAND IN SEVENTEEN SYLLABLES Sun, 26 May 2013 02:47:04 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5 Comment on U.S. v. Tinklenberg (May 26, 2011) by Mario Mahoney http://supremecourthaiku.com/blog1/2011/05/31/u-s-v-tinklenberg-may-26-2011/comment-page-1/#comment-99792 Mario Mahoney Sun, 26 May 2013 02:47:04 +0000 http://supremecourthaiku.com/blog1/?p=1022#comment-99792 I observe you haven’t written yet another weblog for a time?

]]> Comment on Skinner v. Switzer (Mar. 7, 2011) by hausratversicherung schweiz vergleich http://supremecourthaiku.com/blog1/2011/03/07/skinner-v-switzer-mar-7-2011/comment-page-1/#comment-99744 hausratversicherung schweiz vergleich Sat, 25 May 2013 12:51:23 +0000 http://supremecourthaiku.com/blog1/?p=592#comment-99744 This internet site is really a walk-through for all with the information you wanted about this and didn’t know who to ask. Glimpse here, and you’ll undoubtedly discover it.

]]> Comment on Kirtsaeng v. John Wiley & Sons, Inc. (Mar. 19, 2013) by Klein Trial Lawyers http://supremecourthaiku.com/blog1/2013/03/19/kirtsaeng-v-john-wiley-sons-inc-mar-19-2013/comment-page-1/#comment-96443 Klein Trial Lawyers Mon, 08 Apr 2013 20:53:16 +0000 http://supremecourthaiku.com/blog1/?p=2252#comment-96443 Finally answers
“Gray market” theme in Costsco
Case two terms ago

]]> Comment on Marshall v. Rodgers (April 1, 2013) by Paige D. Hoyt http://supremecourthaiku.com/blog1/2013/04/02/marshall-v-rodgers-april-1-2013/comment-page-1/#comment-95984 Paige D. Hoyt Thu, 04 Apr 2013 15:59:01 +0000 http://supremecourthaiku.com/blog1/?p=2278#comment-95984 I hate attorneys
I can do it all myself
What? Guilty? Mulligan!!!

]]> Comment on Comcast Corp. v. Behrend (Mar. 27, 2013) by DaveR http://supremecourthaiku.com/blog1/2013/03/28/comcast-corp-v-behrend-mar-27-2013/comment-page-1/#comment-95411 DaveR Thu, 28 Mar 2013 17:57:31 +0000 http://supremecourthaiku.com/blog1/?p=2272#comment-95411 Comcast press release
coming between noon and five.
Be available!

]]> Comment on Florida v. Jardines (Mar. 26, 2013) by LFSE http://supremecourthaiku.com/blog1/2013/03/26/florida-v-jardines-mar-26-2013/comment-page-1/#comment-95277 LFSE Wed, 27 Mar 2013 05:10:35 +0000 http://supremecourthaiku.com/blog1/?p=2266#comment-95277 Brilliant!

]]> Comment on Hollingsworth v. Perry & U.S. v. Windsor by Why the Supreme Court matters for existing same-sex marriages | Politically Inclined http://supremecourthaiku.com/blog1/2012/12/08/hollingsworth-v-perry-u-s-v-windsor/comment-page-1/#comment-90992 Why the Supreme Court matters for existing same-sex marriages | Politically Inclined Sun, 27 Jan 2013 03:21:29 +0000 http://supremecourthaiku.com/blog1/?p=2154#comment-90992 [...] Supreme Court’s decision to hear two cases involving gay marriage, Hollingsworth v. Perry and Windsor v. US, represents a watershed moment for LGBT relationships. [...]

]]> Comment on Smith v. U.S. (Jan. 9, 2013) by Paula Angelique Hafner http://supremecourthaiku.com/blog1/2013/01/10/smith-v-u-s-jan-9-2013/comment-page-1/#comment-89640 Paula Angelique Hafner Mon, 14 Jan 2013 08:13:35 +0000 http://supremecourthaiku.com/blog1/?p=2191#comment-89640 These are awesome. I was just thinking of such an idea the other day. Of course all the good ideas are taken.

]]> Comment on Hobby Lobby Stores, Inc. v. Sebelius (Dec. 26, 2012) (Sotomayor, J.) by SupremeCourtHaiku http://supremecourthaiku.com/blog1/2012/12/27/hobby-lobby-stores-inc-v-sebelius-dec-26-2012-sotomayor-j/comment-page-1/#comment-89007 SupremeCourtHaiku Wed, 09 Jan 2013 00:07:48 +0000 http://supremecourthaiku.com/blog1/?p=2175#comment-89007 Hooray a comment!

It has been quite a while

Get others involved.

]]> Comment on Hobby Lobby Stores, Inc. v. Sebelius (Dec. 26, 2012) (Sotomayor, J.) by Jim Spelman http://supremecourthaiku.com/blog1/2012/12/27/hobby-lobby-stores-inc-v-sebelius-dec-26-2012-sotomayor-j/comment-page-1/#comment-88560 Jim Spelman Thu, 03 Jan 2013 21:11:09 +0000 http://supremecourthaiku.com/blog1/?p=2175#comment-88560 I love this so much!
Politics with brevity
I’m glad I found you

Religious freedom
Law can not dictate practice
Constitutional

Buy contraception?
While we pray for purity?
A contradiction!

]]>