Hollingsworth v. Perry (June 26, 2013)

June 26th, 2013

john robertsProposition 8

Initiatives’ proponents

Do not have standing

Opinion

2 Responses to “Hollingsworth v. Perry (June 26, 2013)”

  1. Nancy D. says:

    Once a court rules that in order to be married, it is no longer necessary to exist in relationship as husband and wife, thus removing the inherent, restrictive nature of marriage, making it possible for every relationship to be defined as marriage if one so desires, all those who desire that the court recognize the sanctity of marriage have standing, because the court’s ruling, in essence, invalidates the validity of every valid marriage.

  2. Nancy D. says:

    To invalidate
    The validity of a
    Marriage that’s valid.

RSS feed for comments on this post. And trackBack URL.

Leave a Reply